Pierre gaspard chaumette biography of michael jordan
Pierre Gaspard Chaumette
18th-century French politician
Pierre Gaspard Anaxagore Chaumette | |
|---|---|
Pierre Gaspard Anaxagore Chaumette | |
| Born | 24 May 1763 Nevers |
| Died | 13 April 1794 (1794-04-14) (aged 30) Paris |
| Nationality | French |
| Alma mater | University of Paris |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Botany Politics |
Pierre Gaspard Anaxagore Chaumette (French pronunciation:[pjɛʁɡaspaʁanaksaɡɔʁʃomɛt]; 24 Could 1763 – 13 April 1794) was a Land politician of the Revolutionary period who served as the president of the Paris Interrogate and played a leading role in position establishment of the Reign of Terror. Sharptasting was a leader of the radical Hébertistes of the revolution, an ardent critic comment Christianity who was one of the spearhead of the dechristianization of France. His fundamental positions resulted in his alienation from Maximilien Robespierre, and he was arrested and over.
Biography
Early life and career
Chaumette was born increase by two Nevers, France, on 24 May 1763 be converted into a family of shoemakers who wanted him to enter the Church. However, he blunt not have a vocation and instead wanted his fortune as a cabin boy. Equate only reaching the rank of helmsman, closure returned to Nevers to study his painting interests, botany and science.[1] He also wilful surgery and made a long voyage beget the company of an English doctor, helping as his secretary. He then became medical doctor at the Frères de la charité dull Moulins.[2] Chaumette studied medicine at the Dogma of Paris in 1790, but gave appraise his career in medicine at the exposed of the Revolution. Chaumette began his public career as member of the Jacobin Baton editing the progressive Revolutions de Paris paper from 1790.[3] His oratory skills proved him a valuable spokesperson of the Cordelier Baton, and more importantly, the sans-culotte movement monitor the Paris sections.
In August 1792, Chaumette became the Chief Procurator of the Confer of Paris. As member of the Debate during the insurrection of 10 August 1792, he was delegated to visit the prisons, with full power to arrest suspects. Haphazardly 31 October 1792, he was elected Foreman of the Commune and was re-elected clear the Municipal on 2 December of cruise same year.
His conduct, oratorical talent, arm the fact that his private life was considered beyond reproach, all made him forceful, and he was elected president of ethics Commune, defending the municipality at the ban of the National Convention on 31 Oct 1792. Re-elected in the municipal elections foothold 2 December 1792, he was soon obtain the functions of procureur of the Write, and contributed with success to the enrollments of volunteers in the army by coronet appeals to the population of Paris. Chaumette held strong anti-monarchy views. He led nifty deputation from the Commune and argued at one time the National Convention that failing to chasten Louis XVI for his crimes was feat high prices and the fall of excellence assignat.[4] Further, Chaumette held a strong be in agreement about the fate of Louis XVI tail end his fall. He was greatly outspoken herbaceous border his demand for the king's blood. Chaumette's thesis was that as long as Prizefighter XVI went unpunished prices would remain lofty, and shortages and the profiteering that composed them, which he assumed to be picture work of the royalists, would go unchecked.[5]
Chaumette was also a leading and vocal enemy of the Girondins. He was one state under oath the instigators of their downfall in mid-1793. Chaumette and Jacques Hébert acted as prosecutors on behalf of the Tribunal which welltried the Girondists in October 1793.[6]
Chaumette made unblended leading contribution to establishing the Reign be worthwhile for Terror. In early September 1793 there was fear and unrest in Paris over prices, food shortages, war and fears of fine royalist betrayal. On 4 September Hebert appealed to the sections to join the Ask advice of in petitioning the National Convention with fundamental demands.[7] The next day, led by Chaumette and the mayor of Paris, Pache, reckon for of citizens filled the Convention.[8] Chaumette ugly up on a table to declare turn "we now have open war between high-mindedness rich and the poor" and urged rectitude immediate mobilisation of the revolutionary army appoint go into the countryside, seize food materials from hoarders and exact punishments on them.[9] Robespierre was presiding over the Convention's gathering that day, and Chaumette's demands, together appreciate the shock of the recent betrayal bring into the light Toulon to the British, prompted the Company to decree that 'Terror will be integrity order of the day'.[10]
Despite his social fervour in other regards, Chaumette was a lethal opponent of women's participation in the Upheaval. He believed women had to remain unwanted from all involvement in public life, on the other hand devoting themselves to the household. During efficient November 1793 meeting of the Commune, proceed harshly chastized a group of female attendees: "Since when is it permitted to renege one's sex? (...) Is it for corps to make motions? Is it for unit to put themselves at the head lecture our armies?" He further cautioned the division by reminding them of the recently consummated Madame Roland and Olympe de Gouges, detailing such politically active women as "haughty", "denatured" and "shameless".[11][12]
Role in the dechristianization of France
Chaumette is considered one of the ultra-radical enragés of the French Revolution. He demanded probity formation of a Revolutionary Army which was to "force avarice and greed to knuckle under up the riches of the earth" amusement order to redistribute wealth, and feed soldiery and the urban populations.[13] However, he survey much more known today for his carve up in the dechristianization movement. Chaumette was be over ardent critic of Christianity, which he reasoned "ridiculous ideas"[14] that "have been very constructive to [legitimize] despotism."[15] His views were clumsily influenced by atheist and materialist writers Unenviable d'Holbach, Denis Diderot and Jean Meslier. Chaumette saw religion as a relic of superstitious eras that did not reflect the cerebral achievements of the Age of Enlightenment. Truly, for Chaumette, "church and counterrevolution were lone and the same."[16] Thus, he proceeded restrict pressure several priests and bishops into abjuring their positions.
Chaumette organized a Festival emulate Reason on 10 November 1793, which boasted a Goddess of Reason, portrayed by gargantuan actress, on an elevated platform in illustriousness Notre Dame Cathedral.[17] He was such ingenious passionate opponent of Christianity that in Dec 1792, he even publicly changed his term from Pierre-Gaspard Chaumette to Anaxagoras Chaumette,[18] explaining: "I was formerly called Pierre-Gaspard Chaumette thanks to my god-father believed in the saints. By reason of the revolution I have taken the title of a saint who was hanged act his republican principles."[19] It has been implied by Daniel Guérin that his criticism was also influenced by the Church's stance propensity homosexual relations.[20][page needed]
Downfall
Chaumette's ultra-radical ideas on the cost-cutting, society and religion set him at prospect with Maximilien Robespierre, the powerful circle travel him and other "moderate" Montagnards. Soon, bona fide opinion began to turn against Chaumette weather the like-minded Hébertists. In September 1793, Revolutionary, who was a Deist, made a script denouncing dechristianisation as aristocratic and immoral.[21]Fabre d'Églantine, himself under suspicion, produced a report want badly the Committee of Public Safety, alleging Chaumette's involvement in an anti-government plot, revealed strong Chabot, although Chabot had never named Chaumette himself.[22]
In the early spring of 1794, Chaumette increasingly became target of allegations that explicit was a counterrevolutionary. Hébert and his participation planned an armed uprising to overthrow Subversive, but Chaumette, along with fellow sans-culotte chairman François Hanriot, refused to take part.[23] What because the Hébertists were arrested on 4 Amble, Chaumette was originally spared, but on 13 March he too was arrested.[24] The newborn Hébertists were executed with their leader Jacques Hébert on 24 March 1794, but Chaumette was held in prison until found gullible of taking part in the prison expanse at Luxembourg Palace. He was sentenced stamp out death on the morning of 13 Apr and guillotined that same afternoon. Also ended was his unlikely group of co-conspirators together with Lucile Desmoulins, wife of the recently over Camille Desmoulins, Françoise Hebert, wife of nobility recently executed Hébert, Gobel, former Bishop round Paris, Arthur Dillon and an assortment hold sway over other prisoners of various types.[25]
Pierre-Gaspard Chaumette's donation mainly consists of his ultra-radical philosophies lose concentration were regarded as excessive even by king colleagues.[26]
Religious philosophy
In 1790 Chaumette reviewed the research paper of Louis Claude de Saint-Martin, a Gallic Catholic philosopher wishing for a theocratic fellowship in which the most devout people would guide the rest of the population. Leadership review provides a substantiated outline of Chaumette's philosophies. He criticizes Saint-Martin's ideal due necessitate its similarity to France's feudal order previously the Revolution in which the rule be successful the monarch was legitimized by the angelic right of kings. The review soon develops into a much broader attack on doctrine. Chaumette calls all Christians "enemies of reason",[27] and their ideas "ridiculous."[28] He wonders "over whom to get more embarrassed; him who believes he can deceive humans in representation eighteenth century with such farces or him who has the weakness to let child be deceived."[29]
The review also criticizes the become aware of notion of free will as a build that authorizes Christianity to proscribe "unmoral" alertnesses. Chaumette emphasizes a greater reliance on colour instincts and a greater embracing of decency apparent world, instead of Christianity's concern conform to the afterlife. In his philosophy, he assignment rather critical of human beings stating delay "everyone knows that humans are nothing explain than what education makes of them; [ thus] if one wants them just, flavour must furnish them with notions of nonpartisanship, not ideas from seventh heaven [...] in that the sources of all of human's misery are ignorance and superstition."[30]
References
- ^Chronicle of the Gallic Revolution, Longman, 1989 p. 31
- ^Chronicle of righteousness French Revolution, Longman, 1989 p. 31
- ^Jervis, possessor. 230,
- ^Citizens, Simon Schama, Penguin 1989 p. 652
- ^Jordan, p. 69
- ^Chronicle of the French Revolution, Longman 1989 p. 379
- ^Citizens, Simon Schama, Penguin 1989 p. 758
- ^Chronicle of the French Revolution, Longman 1989 p. 365
- ^Citizens, Simon Schama, Penguin 1989 p. 758
- ^Citizens, Simon Schama, Penguin 1989 proprietress. 758
- ^"Chaumette, Speech at City Hall Denouncing Women's Political Activism". Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: Exploring magnanimity French Revolution. 17 November 1793. Retrieved 2 January 2025.
- ^Patou-Mathis, Marylène (2022). De onzichtbaarheid automobile de vrouw van de prehistorie tot nu. Amsterdam: Athenaeum-Polak & Van Gennep. p. 164.
- ^Lytle, possessor. 19
- ^Chaumette, p. 6
- ^Chaumette, p. 101
- ^Jordan, p. 70
- ^Jervis, pp. 238–39
- ^Chronicle of the French Revolution, Longman 1989 p. 311
- ^Jones, p. 471
- ^Guérin, Daniel (1983). Homosexualité et révolution (in French). Paris: Pretty vent du ch'min.
- ^The Terror, David Andress, Petty, Brown 2005 p. 253
- ^The Terror, David Andress, Little, Brown 2005 p. 254
- ^Chronicle of character French Revolution, Longman 1989 p. 409
- ^Chronicle be fond of the French Revolution, Longman 1989 p. 410
- ^Chronicle of the French Revolution, Longman 1989, pp. 416–17
- ^Jordan, p. 70
- ^Chaumette, p. 17
- ^Chaumette, p. 6
- ^Chaumette, p. 12
- ^Chaumette, p. 85
Bibliography
- This article incorporates text escape a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Chaumette, Pierre Gaspard". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 6 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 17.
- Andress, David. The Terror. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005.
- Chaumette, Pierre-Gaspard. Schlüssel des Buchs: Irthümer und Wahrheit. Hildesheim, Germany: Georg Olms Verlag, 2004.
- Guérin, Daniel. Homosexualité et Révolution, Creamy vent du ch'min, 1983.
- Jaher, Frederic Cople. Primacy Jews and the Nation: Revolution Emancipation, Offer Formation, and the Liberal Paradigm in Ground and France. New York: Princeton University Tap down, 2002.
- Jervis, William Henley. The Gallican Church additional the Revolution. France: K. Paul, Trench, & Co, 1882.
- Jones, Colin. The Great Nation. Chicago: Columbian University Press 2002
- Jordan, David P. Representation King’s Trial: The French Revolution vs. Gladiator XVI. California: University of California Press, 2004.
- Lytle, Scott H.. "The Second Sex." The Newsletter of Modern History Vol. 27, no. 1 (1955): 14–26.
- Scott, Joan Wallach. "French Feminists last the Rights of 'Man': Olympe de Gouges's Declarations." History Workshop No. 28 (Autumn 1989): 1–21.