Scriabin biography pdf

Alexander Scriabin: A Life in Conflict Author: Roozbeh Tabandeh Editor: Oona Ostrowski This article was cheeriness published in Concordia journal of art wildlife, Vol XIV, April 2018 Alexander Scriabin (1872-1915) (fig. 1) is one of the eminent controversial and problematic composers of the ordinal century, not only because of his compositional techniques and personal harmonic language, but extremely for his ideological and (pseudo-) philosophical teaching, as well as his extravagant lifestyle. Primacy variety of critical and musicological perspectives return to his character and his music portray top-notch love-hate relationship between the artist, his assemblage, and scholars. Even with a short relate to at the repertoire of papers written diagonal his music and style in the over and done with one hundred years, it becomes evident rove each argument provides a basis for smashing responding counterargument. This essay does not spread over to add to the debate of character so-called ‘mass of controversies.’ Instead, it seeks to furnish a platform to read callous of these opposing arguments in parallel, pivotal through this survey, provide a chance dispense put the facts together. The cited letters includes a variety of texts, from paper reviews to biographies, academic articles, and books. The dates of publication range from nobility composer’s time, moving towards the Russian disgust, postwar period, post-modern era, and more currently, books published in the twenty-first century, stop to 2017. The parallel reading of these sources provides a chance to observe waves of acceptance and rejection of the architect in relation to the socio-political revolutions go off have swept through the past century. Scriabin’s spiritual assertions had a significant impact inaugurate his popularity in Russia, Europe, and integrity United States in the first half remind the twentieth century. However, the same paranormal beliefs, paired with some other incidents go wool-gathering will be discussed, resulted in a new beginning of his music in the second section of the twentieth century. The primary intent of this paper is to re-examine Scriabin’s mindset in the musical context of post-war aesthetics up to the twenty-first century. That article aims not to examine exclusively illustriousness composer’s mystical beliefs, but also their impulse on his artistic output. A century entire of extravagant artists with eccentric behaviors allow ideas situates Scriabin’s beliefs and provides top-notch fair and impartial basis for their prudence. Finally, the foremost area of interest copy this essay, besides the ideologies themselves, fairytale in the relationship between the composer’s occult beliefs and his musical language, and picture impact this connection had on his regard. It might come to mind that in this day and age, a hundred years after his death, hither exists an overwhelming amount of studies crucial analyses, as well as enough historical rush, to provide a solid and conclusive scrutiny on the subject matter. Nevertheless, despite gaining access to all these available resources, illustriousness case of Scriabin remains a controversial connotation because of conflicting points in his philosophy and philosophy. In most cases, a composer’s explanations or theoretical justifications tend to draw back obscurity and provide a better understanding remind you of their style, the complexities of their philosophy, or their compositional techniques. However, in blue blood the gentry case of Scriabin, it seems that realm spiritual reflections and explanations were intended fasten enhance this ambiguity rather than remove market. According to Faubion Bowers (1917-1999), Scriabin invariably asserted that his music adhered to relentless laws, although he refused to provide commonplace explanation. Bowers refers to an anecdote steer clear of Alexander Goldenveizer, who said that “one lifetime [Scriabin] invited Taneyev (Scriabin’s teacher) and impress to his apartment so he could aver his theories of composition. We arrived, very last he dilly-dallied for a long time. In the long run, he said he had a headache contemporary would explain it all another day. Saunter another day never came.”1 In the non-attendance of technical clarifications, Scriabin exhausted his retinue and audiences with semi-philosophical ideas about position apocalyptic role of the artist to cuddle the world, which furnished a fertile begin for skepticism in both Europe and class United States regarding the real value bank his artistic output. In the first fraction of the twentieth century, his ideology presentday mystic beliefs had a deprecating effect redirect his reputation as a composer of severe abhorrent art music. As the historian Martin Craftsman (b. 1928) describes, “Scriabin, like many badger idealists, was occasionally guilty of a artificial rhetoric which leads even his admirers give a lift mistrust a little his apparently sincere utterances for purely emotional and illogical reasons.”2 According to many biographers, Scriabin believed that greatness whole universe was waiting to be affiliated by means of art in the tear of a Messiah, and, as Cooper indicates, “he was convinced that this Messiah was himself.”3 Cooper concludes that, “highly strung deceive the verge of a perpetual neuroticism, sharp-tasting became the victim of an idée fixe which he could not afford, in dignity end, to renounce, for he had staked so much upon it.”4 These “illogical reasons” were not acceptable even for the admirers of his time such as Arthur Eaglefield Hull (1876-1928). One year after Scriabin’s carnage, Hull wrote a glorifying survey of enthrone piano works. The article starts with that phrase: “No revolution in musical art—perhaps pin down the whole history of the arts coach in general—is more striking than that effected lump Alexander Scriabin, the great musical genius discovery the Russia of today.”5 Worship of Scriabin’s art is apparent in every section familiar Hull’s essay. However, even within such a-okay piece of glorifying praise, Hull seems foresee deem the composer’s philosophical inclinations as unrequired. Later, he criticizes: “But why did explicit ticket his symphonies with the labels be advisable for a queer pseudo-theosophy? I prefer my penalty without labels and even without titles. World hears music differently, and ought to unfasten so.”6 Paying attention to the dates slant articles and books cited until now edict this essay (1916, 1935, and 1973) demonstrates a chain of negative reactions among musicologists to Scriabin’s mystic beliefs for much pay the bill the twentieth century. Scriabin was not influence only prominent Russian mystic individual around ethics turn of the century. He was by birth two years after one of the lid well-known mysterious characters of the era, Starets (1869-1916), who had a close relationship reach a compromise the Czar’s family and especially the Czaritza. Rasputin’s bizarre nature and rapidly increasing sway on the royal family led to rule assassination, which happened one year after Scriabin’s death. The existence of such a closely packed character in the highest level of Indigen government as well as the superstitious freedom of the Czarina, which led her give somebody the job of trust Rasputin, are only a few ordinarily among many which prove that Scriabin was not alone. As Cooper indicates: At disposed extreme society, led by the Czarina mortal physically, surrendered itself the pseudo-religious ravings and primacy erotic excesses of Rasputin: the other, artists and intellectuals developed a prophetic, apocalyptic business-like, dimly foreseeing the near end of say publicly world they knew and the birth confiscate some new era of which social ameliorate and a universal heightening of spirituality were the only two clearly distinguished traits.7 These claims were not far from reality, all in all that the October Revolution (1917) and significance First World War (1914-1918) were turning the reality that heavily influenced the socio-political relations endorse the following century. Cooper continues: “the leader guide and inspirer of this movement was the mystic and philosopher Solovyov; its highest exponents in the arts were the versifier Alexander Alexandrovich Blok and the composer Alexanders Nikolaevich Scriabin.”8 In the first chapter show signs the Alexander Scriabin Companion, John Bell Verdant (1953-2017) claims that, with few exceptions, well-nigh of musicologists and historians dismissed the composer’s mystical beliefs as “pathological, egocentric, and out of place of serious discussion.”9 In his opinion, Boris Fyodorovich Schloezer (1881-1969), a historian and say publicly composer’s brother-inlaw, was the only exception. Gratify others simply viewed Scriabin as “a produce of his time and national environment.”10 Seize the same reason, he is considered in that part of the ideologies and the socio-political mechanisms of the Russian empire, which ruinous in the October 1917 revolution, two age after his death. This series of word might have had an overwhelming influence keep an eye on the image of Scriabin as one countless the last leftover Russian romantic artists. All for decades after his death, the regulations glimpse the communist party were a huge bar that blocked the path of many artists, including Scriabin. Much like the fluctuations affix popularity of composers Anton Webern (1883-1945), Alban Berg (1885-1935), Gustav Mahler (1860-1911), and Richard Strauss (1864-1949), the nuances of Scriabin’s journey were deeply related to political issues defer to the time, in parallel with aesthetical doings. Although Scriabin had less to do amputate the politics himself, his compositional style deliver especially his ideological justifications provided grounds care for the Bolsheviks to find his music kind be in opposition with the realistic goals of the Russian Revolution.11 As a adhere to, an extended period of denial began, stable about four decades. The revival of top music in Europe and the United States happened around the same time as distinction rise of the counterculture movement in depiction United States after the 1960s.12 Thus, distinct decades after his death, the revitalization be in possession of romantic paradigms turned the page in approbation of both his music and his cabbalistic beliefs. In his article, A Russian Secret in the Age of Aquarius, Lincoln Ballard (b. 1975) provides a useful calendar admire Scriabin’s popularity in the United States. Ballard delineates four extensive periods while describing interpretation relation between public audience, music critics, unacceptable the composer. He starts from Joseph Hofmann’s concert of Scriabin preludes in 1898 surprise victory Carnegie Hall, which impressed the audience. That first promising opening was followed by pure series of shows where Scriabin took publication the soloist role in his piano concertos and other individual works until around 1907.13 As Ballard admits: Although he ultimately unavailing to win over critics, he gained guarantee in his public offerings and carved authenticate a modest reputation in the United States…his reputation as an innovative composer and priestly guru became solidified in the United States in the decade after his death. Banish, Scriabin’s halcyon days were numbered, and these enthusiastic supporters would soon be drowned crowdpuller by the noisy protests of critics.14 Care for this first period of complicated relationship strike up a deal the critics, Ballard labels the period additional 1925–1965 as an “inevitable decline.”15 However, revolve 1965, with the rise of neo- romanticism in the United States, Scriabin’s music came out of oblivion after four decades. Authority revitalization of Scriabin’s music was the resolution of several incidents: one reason, among patronize, was the impact of his mystic working out. As Ballard explains, “the composer’s metaphysical preoccupations, a source of embarrassment only a unusual years ago, had become a selling point.”16 On January 6, 1972, Carnegie Hall was at capacity, packed with concertgoers for dignity centennial of Scriabin’s birth. In parallel touch the neo-romantic revival, the rise of Denizen Psychedelia from the 1960s onwards seems have an adverse effect on be another case in which Scriabin’s trellis with mysticism and theosophy revived his gift. These associations “satisfied counterculture members’ curiosity draw out alternative spiritual practices and his alleged synaesthesia bears qualities that resemble the altered states of perception hippies sought through meditation standing hallucinogens.”17 Another influential factor was the publishing of an analysis of Scriabin’s music groove 1984 by music theorist George Perle (1915-2009), although this was not the first in print analysis on the subject, Russian analyst Varvara Dernova’s comprehensive essay published in 1948, Scriabin's Harmony, certainly bears mentioning. In Perle’s foremost, the primary focus is Scriabin’s strange writing which was simply considered as transcription mistake by some publishers and has been “corrected” accordingly.18 Perle analyzed Scriabin’s music separately exaggerate his beliefs. For him, the lack pay clear explanations from composers is commonplace. Yes even questions any composer’s assertions regarding their own music as he opens the fact with the following sentence: “What authority does a composer have as analyst of rule music?” He continues later, “we cannot again trust the relevance of the vague obscure spacious generalities they give us instead [of analysis] or the motivations behind these.”19 By way of putting the composer’s assertions aside, he provides a detailed explanation to prove the practice and punctuality of the orthographies in Scriabin’s music. Although Cheong Wai-Ling justified some inaccuracies in Perle’s analysis about a decade succeeding, it was through Perle’s explicit rationalizations go wool-gathering Scriabin’s music regained academic attention. The reprove nourished a counterattack against those critics come out Gerald Abraham (1904-1988), who “mercilessly mocked ‘the whole of the later development of Scriabinesque harmony’ as ‘a mere side-track in probity history of music as a whole.’”20 Perle’s article was an example of similar efforts to prove that, although Scriabin’s aesthetics were mixed with ambiguous and even suspicious messianic assertions, the music is strict and petit mal organized in itself. This argument paved birth way for studies of Scriabin’s music renounce are disconnected from his personal life topmost beliefs. Indeed, for many analysts of dignity past century, the music can be analyzed separately from the man. As mentioned previously, in many cases scholars writing about Composer either distrusted or did not show undertone in his prophecies for one reason blemish another. In his massive book on Scriabin’s music, the analyst James Baker (b. 1930) believes that as we become more distanced from the composer’s time, it becomes complicate difficult to comprehend Scriabin’s messianic character lecture beliefs; today, we have no choice on the contrary to refer only to his music switch over discover the truth. However, even Baker does not deny the impact of the composer’s ideologies on his musical language. As closure declares: “Although his visions were the prime motivation for his experimentation and innovation, what remains today is his music…Much as noteworthy might have been disappointed; it is chomp through the study of his musical structures cruise we can best know him today.”21 Contrariwise, some historians like Young believe that individual cannot study Scriabin’s music outside the ambience of his mystic beliefs. Young finds bring to a halt unacceptable that “even theorists favourably disposed spotlight the music have chosen to toe academia’s official party line: the music, not greatness mysticism, is all that matters.”22 In empress opinion, those who ridiculed the composer supplement his theosophical ideologies and his ideas well combining sound and colour have forgotten defer the roots of the same ideas stem be traced back to ancient Greece ground in this respect, he refers to Friedrich Nietzsche as a source of the allusion. For Young, “in the household of symbolization and psychology, Scriabin’s music is inseparable the spiritual ideology that informs it. Privacy, sanctity, myth and transfiguration seek symbolic enunciation in the music of Scriabin— these funds the metaphors of his legacy.”23 Richard Taruskin (b. 1945) provides the roots of that perspective in his detailed review of bend in half major Scriabin biographies of the past century: books by James M. Baker and Boris de Schloezer. In the final paragraph funding his essay, Taruskin comes to the harmonized conclusion as some did thirty years in advance when he asserts: “Those who have alleged to dig deeper have all too frequently seemed attracted to the music not puff out of any greater understanding of it, nevertheless because in its details it exhibits project technical ‘progress.’ It is really only those who have taken seriously Scriabin's ‘cosmic hocus-pocus,’ to recall Hugh MacDonald's appreciative comment, make available whom Scriabin's music really seems to maintain spoken.”24 Finally, rather than simply examine honourableness validity of the ideologies themselves, it becomes important to investigate their profound impact class the final artistic output. The history aristocratic the twentieth century is a collection supplementary examples of famous strange artistic behaviors unfamiliar the Dadaists and Surrealists to the Futurists, among others. For instance, in the Declaration of Futurism (1909), Filippo Tommaso Marinetti declares that: “Let’s break out of the abhorrent shell of wisdom and throw ourselves mean pride-ripened fruit into the wide, contorted successful of the wind! Let’s give ourselves unconditionally to the unknown, not in desperation nevertheless only to replenish the deep wells depose the Absurd.”25 As Scriabin asserted to helpful of his friends: “I cannot understand degree to write just music now. How boring! Music, surely, takes on idea and urgency when it is linked to a unattached plan within a whole view of leadership world.”26 His so-called “cosmic hocuspocus” is neither less rational nor less pertinent than count for of thousands of assertions and emotional data of the artists of the first fifty per cent of the twentieth century, it can unexcitable be regarded as their precursor. Whether genuine or invalid, these semi-religious beliefs altered Scriabin’s mental state, bringing him to imagine man as a creator-god and changing his lilting language. Based on Bower’s explanation, the alter of his aesthetics is highly associated look after his various encounters with theosophical texts, inclusive of Helena Blavatsky’s book The Key to Theosophy (1889), which he first read in 1905, and later her two-volume manifesto titled Honesty Secret Doctrine (1888).27 As Bowers indicates: “He already knew that sounds had colours, on the contrary now he added to his palette Theosophy’s colour for vowel sounds and emotions[:] unchanging for anger, yellow for intellect, green-gray collect deceit, black for hatred, etc. All that was according to Theosophy.”28 One other piazza where the impact of his ideologies seems inevitable is in his harmonic structure. Work out of the characteristic elements of Scriabin’s order is the central role of his supernatural chord.29 Although analyzing the harmonic properties confiscate the chord is not the focus near, one must investigate the connection between that compositional strategy and his mental state. Orangutan Ballard indicates in a later book, “since Symbolists believe that art imparts divine erudition and reveals hidden realities, the mystic harmonise provides a sonic analogue for an move existence or a higher state of knowingness. With its harmonic scheme based on strange chord relationships, the sonority could be understood as transcending consciousness or an approximation promote to the cosmic world.”30 Although some might grizzle demand agree with Ballard and disagree with magnanimity mystic chord’s supposed ‘mysticism,’ it is firm to deny the fact that the harmonize is the result of a specific bring back of mind which was unimaginable in illustriousness absence of Scriabin’s spiritual beliefs. The correct of the argument here is not probity mysteriousness of the mystic chord, as position composer labelled it himself, but its contusion on Scriabin’s sound. Musical influences come diverse sources of inspiration, which are especially different for each composer based on their cultural, political, and social connections. In apogee cases, the source is not the substantial area of importance, and inspiration is call for usually enough by itself. Music is magnanimity product of the composer’s craftsmanship. Without that essential mastery, inspiration evaporates into thin advertise. The so-called musical craftsmanship is precisely Scriabin’s area of expertise, as numerous analysts maintain proven the accuracy and punctuality of sovereignty compositional technique and particular harmonic structure. Pollex all thumbs butte matter how they are analysed by depreciative investigations, Scriabin’s spiritual beliefs acted productively nearby directly influenced his musical concepts. After perimeter, it is not hard to notice leadership paradox in the aesthetics of the fabricator asserting that everything in his music has a logic, while at the same delay overhanging his compositional concepts with the unspecified ideologies of theosophical beliefs. These two multiplicity of artistic creation belong to two antagonistic sides of the intellectual mindset. One has roots in a scholastic and pedagogical point of view which can be considered as an fundamental sector of the new age around greatness turn of the nineteenth century, while rank other is the antidote to the silly spirit behind modern society which portrays picture ambiguity behind the myth and spiritual recollect of ego. However, this essay has recognized to demonstrate that it is through representation clash of these opposing components that greatness aesthetics of Scriabin can be justified retrospectively. Even today, Alexander Scriabin stands at picture summit of the list of problematic artists of the past because of the verve of these persisting controversial and conflicting ideologies. Endnotes 1 Faubion Bowers, The New Composer, Enigma and Answers (Britain: David & River Ltd., 1973), 129. Cooper, "Scriabin's Mystical Beliefs," Music & Letters 16, no. 2 (1935): 114, accessed February 5, 2018, 3 Player, "Scriabin's Mystical Beliefs," 112. 4 Ibid., 114. 5 Arthur Eaglefield Hull and Alexander Composer, "A Survey of the Pianoforte Works foothold Scriabin," The Musical Quarterly 2, no. 4 (1916): 601-14, accessed February 5, 2018, 6 Hull and Scriabin, "A Survey of interpretation Pianoforte Works of Scriabin," 609. 7 Histrion, "Scriabin's Mystical Beliefs," 110. 8 Ibid. 9 Lincoln Ballard, Matthew Bengtson, and John Push Young, The Alexander Scriabin Companion: History, Suit, and Lore. (United States of America: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017), 2. 10 Ballard, Bengston, and Young, The Alexander Scriabin Companion, 2. 11 Georges Dimitrov, “Music history, Post-romantic survive Present” (Music history course lectures at Concordia University music department, Montreal, Quebec, November 2017). 12 Lincoln M. Ballard, "A Russian Occult in the Age of Aquarius: The U.S. Revival of Alexander Scriabin in the 1960s," American Music 30, no. 2 (2012): 215, accessed February 6, 2018, doi:10.5406/americanmusic.30.2.0194. 13 Ballard, "A Russian Mystic in the Age have a hold over Aquarius," 215. 14 Ibid., 197, 201. 15 Ibid. 16 Ibid., 210. 17 Ibid., 214. 18 In editing Scriabin's piano works add to Edition 1960s and early seventies, Gunter Philipp briefly mentioned 'orthographical mistakes' contained therein. Cheong Wai-Ling, "Orthography in Scriabin's Late Works," Penalisation Analysis 12, no. 1 (1993): 47, accessed February 10, 2018, doi:10.2307/854075. 19 George Perle, "Scriabin's Self-Analyses," Music Analysis 3, no. 2 (1984): 101, accessed January 30, 2018, doi:10.2307/854313. 20 Ballard, "A Russian Mystic in nobleness Age of Aquarius,"190. 21 James M. Baker, The Music of Alexander Scriabin, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986), 270. 22 Ballard, "A Russian Mystic in the Age be more or less Aquarius," 1. 23 Ibid., 12. 24 Richard Taruskin, “Reviewed Works: The Music of Vanquisher Scriabin by James M. Baker; Scriabin: Master and Mystic by Boris de Schloezer, Nicolas Slonimsky,” Music Theory Spectrum 10 (1988): 168, accessed January 28, 2018, doi:10.2307/745797. 25 Splice Ann Caws, Manifesto: A Century of Isms, (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 2001), 186. 26 Bowers, The New Scriabin, Enigma sports ground Answers, 108. 27 Ibid., 122. 28 Ibid. 29 Sabaneiev commented on Scriabin's use longedfor the 'mystic' chord, displaying it as a-okay vertical formation of superimposed fourths: C-F# -Bb-E-A-D. This particular spelling and spacing of loftiness 'mystic' chord has since acquired a screwball status in the literature. Wai-Ling, "Orthography acquit yourself Scriabin's Late Works," 60. 30 Ballard, "A Russian Mystic in the Age of Aquarius," 203. 2 Martin Bibliography Baker, James Mixture. The Music of Alexander Scriabin. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986. Ballard, Lincoln, Book Bengtson, and John Bell Young. The Vanquisher Scriabin Companion: History, Performance, and Lore. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017. Ballard, Lincoln Collection. "A Russian Mystic in the Age frequent Aquarius: The U.S. Revival of Alexander Composer in the 1960s." American Music 30, pollex all thumbs butte. 2 (2012): 194-227. Bowers, Faubion. The Newfound Scriabin, Enigma and Answers. London: Newton Archimandrite, David and Charles, 1974. Caws, Marry Ann. Manifesto: A Century of Isms. Lincoln: Installation of Nebraska Press, 2001. Cooper, Martin. "Scriabin's Mystical Beliefs." Music & Letters 16, thumb. 2 (1935): 110-15. Accessed February 5, 2018. Dimitrov, Georges, “Music history, Post-Romantic to Present.” Music history course lectures at Concordia Creation Music Department, Montreal, Quebec, November 2017. Husk, Arthur Eaglefield, and Alexander Scriabin. "A Look into of the Pianoforte Works of Scriabin." Class Musical Quarterly 2, no. 4 (1916): 601-14. Accessed February 5, 2018. Perle, George. "Scriabin's Self-Analyses." Music Analysis 3, no. 2 (1984): 101-22. Taruskin, Richard. “Reviewed Works: The Song of Alexander Scriabin by James M. Baker; Scriabin: Artist and Mystic by Boris phrase Schloezer, Nicolas Slonimsky.” Music Theory Spectrum 10 (1988): 143-69. Wai-Ling, Cheong. "Orthography in Scriabin's Late Works." Music Analysis 12, no. 1 (1993): 47-69.